Directive 2006/42/EC repealed, Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies from 20 January 2027: EU Machinery Regulation for machine builders

Machine safety · CE marking · Special machines

EU Machinery Regulation 2023/1230: What Changes for Machine Builders in 2027

By Gabriel Weider, mechanical engineer · 11 min read · Updated November 2026

If you design special machines, you have been living with the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC your whole career: risk assessment per ISO 12100, essential requirements in Annex I, a technical file, a declaration of conformity, a CE plate. On 20 January 2027 the Directive is repealed and Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies in its place, everywhere in the EU, with no national transposition and no overlap period.

Most of what you do stays the same. What changes touches the design office directly: modifications made to your machine, the format of the manual, cybersecurity and software in the essential requirements, and a short list of machines that can no longer be self-certified.

> Key takeaways

  • From 20 January 2027, every machine placed on the EU market must comply with Regulation 2023/1230. A machine placed on the market or put into service under the Directive before that date keeps its conformity. There is no overlap period. Machines you build for your own production are covered too.
  • The essential requirements move from Annex I to Annex III and gain new points: protection against corruption (cybersecurity), safety-critical software, and self-evolving behaviour (machine learning). A "substantial modification" of a machine now has a legal definition, and whoever makes one becomes the manufacturer.
  • Instructions can be digital, with conditions. Six categories of machinery (Annex I Part A) must go through a notified body, including safety components whose safety function relies on machine learning.

Directive vs Regulation: what actually changes

A directive is transposed into each national law; a regulation applies as written in all 27 member states. The technical content is about 90% the same, often written in more detail. Where to look when you open the new text:

Topic Directive 2006/42/EC Regulation 2023/1230
Essential health and safety requirements Annex I Annex III (revised and extended)
High-risk machinery Annex IV, self-certification possible with harmonised standards Annex I: Part A (6 categories, notified body mandatory), Part B (self-certification with harmonised standards still possible)
Safety components list Annex V Annex II, now includes stand-alone software with a safety function
Substantial modification Not defined, guidance only Defined in Article 3; the modifier becomes the manufacturer
Instructions Paper Digital allowed, paper on request (Article 10(7))
Cybersecurity, software, AI Not addressed Annex III 1.1.9 and 1.2.1
Application 29 December 2009 20 January 2027, Directive repealed the same day
> No overlap, no grace periodA machine delivered on 19 January 2027 falls under the Directive; the same machine delivered on 20 January must carry a declaration of conformity to the Regulation. With an 8-month lead time, projects quoted today may ship under the new text. Decide now which one each project is certified against.
// related gear "Timeline. Budget. Laws of physics."Project Management Venn Diagram Engineer Tee

Machines built for your own production are in scope

A common belief in factories: "we don't sell this machine, so CE doesn't apply." It does. The Directive already defined the manufacturer as whoever makes machinery and puts it into service, including for their own use, and the Regulation keeps that definition. The trigger is not the sale but the putting into service: the first use for its intended purpose. An assembly cell built for your own line needs the same risk assessment, technical file, declaration and CE marking as one you would sell. For most machines that is still self-certification: no notified body, you sign. The obligation is the file behind the signature.

> From the shop floor: internal machines, internal checksAt a fluid-control manufacturer I worked for, the special machines I designed never left the building. My first jobs there were retrofits: adding operator protection to existing machines, before CE marking was planned for them but with the groundwork in place, risk assessment, guards, safety circuits. Later the company wanted every internal machine CE marked. No notified body: the risk assessment, the safety functions and the technical file were reviewed in-house before the plate went on. The same discipline ran the other way: machines from external suppliers were checked against the same requirements at reception, declaration and manual included, before being put into service. I still build special machines for internal production today, and nothing in the Regulation makes that case lighter.

Substantial modification: your customer can become the manufacturer

Under the Directive, "is this retrofit a new machine?" was answered by national guidance. The Regulation defines it: a substantial modification is a change, by physical or digital means, made after placing on the market, not foreseen by the manufacturer, that creates a new hazard or increases a risk so that new protective measures are needed. Whoever makes one takes on the manufacturer's obligations for the modified machine. "Digital means" is the new part: a software change that alters a safety function counts.

> The retrofit questionOn special machines, retrofits are the norm: a new gripper, a faster axis, a second format, a PLC program rewritten to skip a step. For each one, ask and document: does it add a hazard the original safeguards don't cover? If yes, somebody is the manufacturer of a new machine, and if the user did it alone, that somebody is the user. Write in the manual which changes are foreseen. The clearest protection for both sides is a list.

Annex III: the essential requirements you'll have to read again

Annex III is the old Annex I, extended. Three additions change how a control system is designed and documented.

1.1.9 · New

Protection against corruption

Connecting a device to the machine, locally or remotely, must not create a hazardous situation. Safety-critical software and data must be identified and protected against corruption. The machine must be able to show which software it needs to run safely, and log interventions, legitimate or not.

1.2.1 · Extended

Control systems and software

Control system safety now explicitly covers software: updates, integrity of safety-related code, modified safety functions. The version of the safety PLC program becomes part of the technical file.

1.2.1 · New

Self-evolving behaviour

If a safety function depends on machine learning, its learning phase and limits must be bounded in the risk assessment. Rare on special machines. If yours does it, see Annex I Part A: no self-certification route.

Practically, 1.1.9 is the one that touches a conventional machine with a PLC and an HMI. The technical file will need to say how connections are secured, which software versions are safety-relevant, and how the machine logs changes. On an isolated internal network the file is easier to write than with a remote-maintenance modem, but the question must be answered either way. The Regulation does not cite the Cyber Resilience Act; expect notified bodies to.

// related gear "Fix the failure mode."Fix The Failure Mode Mechanical Engineer Tee

Annex I Part A: six categories that need a notified body

Under the Directive, Annex IV machines could still be self-certified if built fully to harmonised standards. The Regulation splits that list: Part B keeps the possibility, Part A doesn't. These six categories always go through a notified body (EU type-examination, full quality assurance or unit verification):

  1. Removable mechanical transmission devices
  2. Guards for removable mechanical transmission devices
  3. Vehicle servicing lifts
  4. Portable cartridge-operated fixing and other impact machinery
  5. Safety components with fully or partially self-evolving behaviour using machine learning, ensuring safety functions
  6. Machinery with embedded systems of that kind, not placed independently on the market

Items 1 to 4 are rarely a special machine builder's product. Items 5 and 6 are the ones to watch: a vision system that learns to detect an operator in a zone, used as a safety function, puts the whole machine in Part A.

Digital instructions: allowed, with four conditions

Article 10(7) allows digital operating instructions, on four conditions:

  • The machine, its packaging or an accompanying document says how to access them.
  • They are printable, downloadable and savable.
  • They stay available for the machine's expected lifetime and at least ten years after placing on the market.
  • A paper copy is supplied free within one month if the buyer asks at purchase.

For non-professional users, the safety information needed to start and use the machine must still be on paper. For a special machine in a factory, that doesn't apply, but the ten-year availability does: your PDF manual needs a home that outlives your current server.

> Don't confuse "digital" with "in the HMI"A manual that only exists as help screens on the machine's panel doesn't meet the printable, downloadable and savable conditions. Keep the PDF.

What doesn't change

Everything you already do well under the Directive keeps its value: the risk assessment per ISO 12100 as the backbone of the technical file, performance levels per ISO 13849-1 or SIL per IEC 62061 to prove a safety function, harmonised standards for presumption of conformity once listed under the Regulation, the CE marking, the declaration of conformity and the declaration of incorporation for partly completed machinery.

What to plan: your templates. Every declaration of conformity, every "Annex I" reference in a risk assessment report, every document citing 2006/42/EC needs updating for machines delivered from 20 January 2027.

> SwitzerlandSwiss builders export about half their machines to the EU under the mutual recognition agreement. To keep that equivalence, the Federal Council opened a consultation on 19 September 2025 for a total revision of the machinery ordinance (OMach), aligned on Regulation 2023/1230, Part A categories included. In Switzerland the CE marking itself is not mandatory, but conformity with the OMach and the declaration of conformity are, for machines sold and for machines put into service for your own use.

// grabnade.com · apparel

Paperwork vs Machining.

For the machine builder who knows the technical file takes longer than the machine, and that it is the part that keeps people safe. Available as a tee or an eco raglan hoodie.

[ SEE THE TEE ]

The takeaway for the shop floor

Read Annex III once, update your templates, and decide for each open project whether it ships under the Directive or the Regulation. Add three things to the technical file: how connections are protected, which software versions are safety-relevant, which modifications you foresee. And treat the machines you build for your own lines exactly like the ones you would sell: same plate, same file. More designs for people who build the machines in the mechanical engineer collection.

FAQ

When does the Machinery Regulation 2023/1230 apply?

From 20 January 2027. Directive 2006/42/EC is repealed on the same day. The provisions on notified bodies have applied since 20 January 2024.

Does a machine CE marked under the Directive have to be re-certified?

No. Machinery placed on the EU market before 20 January 2027 under the Directive keeps its conformity and can continue to be used and resold. The Regulation applies to machinery placed on the market from that date.

What is a substantial modification under the Machinery Regulation?

A modification, physical or digital, made after the machine was placed on the market, not foreseen by the manufacturer, that creates a new hazard or increases an existing risk so that new protective measures are needed. The person making it becomes the manufacturer of the modified machine.

Can the operating manual be digital only?

Yes for professional machinery, if access is explained, the file is printable and downloadable, it stays available at least ten years, and a paper copy is supplied on request at purchase. Safety information for non-professional users must remain on paper.

Does a machine built for my own factory need CE marking?

Yes. Both the Directive and the Regulation define the manufacturer as whoever makes machinery and puts it into service, including for their own use. Putting into service, not selling, is the trigger. Self-certification remains possible for machines outside Annex I Part A.

Sources and standards

Gabriel Weider, mechanical engineer and founder of grabNade

About the author

Gabriel Weider is a mechanical engineer with 15 years in special machines, CAD, medtech and regulated environments. He still works full-time as an engineer and designs every grabNade shirt. Read his story.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.